Hate speech. Libel. Slander. Threat. Intimidation. Blasphemy.
‘Making words illegal violates our freedom of speech!’ Of course it does. But that freedom, like many others, isn’t absolute. Our freedoms are limited freedoms. They are limited by several things (Joel Feinberg identifies six liberty-limiting principles), one of which is the harm principle. That is, when our action harms another person or society in general, it is limited. It is illegal.
‘But speech isn’t an action. I didn’t do anything. I just said – ’ Saying is doing. Words are speech acts. They are acts of speech. And anyway, if the result is the same, does the method really matter?
‘Yeah but the result isn’t the same. Words can’t hurt you.’ Well, not physically, no. But they can cause psychological injury.[1] And there’s the heart of the matter: should we make causing psychological injury illegal?
Actually, that’s not the heart of the matter. Yes, we should, and we do. The crime of torture includes acts which inflict severe mental pain or suffering (CCC 269.1[1]).
The heart of the matter is Continue reading


















