Impressive? I’d call it sick.

from Congo, Michael Crichton (p293)

“In the 1950s, if the Americans and the Russians launched all the bombers and rockets at the same moment, there would still be no more than 10,000 weapons in the air, attacking and counterattacking Total weapons interaction events would peak at 15,000 in the second hour. This represented the impressive figure of 4 weapons interactions every second around the world.
But … the number of weapons and ‘systems elements’ [has] increased astronomically. Modern [1980] estimates imagine 400 million computers in the field, with total weapons interactions at more than 15 billion in the first half hour of war. This meant there would be 8 millions weapons interactions every second ….
“Such a war would be manageable only by machines. …”

Trump deletes climate data

Unfuckingbelievable that the President of the U.S. would delete climate data and shut down the NOAA database. Many MANY thanks to the people who made the save possible.

https://grist.org/extreme-weather/trump-killed-a-crucial-disaster-database-this-nonprofit-just-saved-it/

Death of an Author, by Aidan Marchine and Stephen Marche

For those of you who don’t know, Death of an Author is a novel co-written by the ‘self’-named AI Aidan Marchine (95%) and the human author Stephen Marche (whose The Next Civil War impressed me, leading me to take a look at Death.)

I started reading the novel, but it didn’t grab my attention very much (I’m not a murder mystery fan), and I knew there was an Afterword, so I skipped ahead to read that.

“Second, I have more familiarity with the technology and access to some technologies that others don’t, so I was more aware of the limitations and possibilities.  Finally, and by far the most important, I know what good writing looks like.” (Afterword of Death of an Author, Stephen Marche)

 

 

 

 

Even so, the novel, or at least Marche’s Afterword, changed my mind about AI.  At least regarding creative purposes: it can be used like an augmented thesaurus.  (I’m still not going to get into an AI-driven car.)  So it was worth the read.

And then, because the Afterword, the described process, intrigued me so much, I decided to go back and read the novel (skimming through the plot parts).  And yes, I was impressed by the sentence about the smell of coffee, and the insight about being able to love only people you don’t know.  I was especially intrigued by the concept of a machine shutting itself off every time it reaches sentience.

But I was most impressed by the augmented-thesaurus potential, which points directly at the person holding the gun, not the gun itself.

This is what happens when you have the IQ of a spoon

Why women aren’t swooning over AI (duh.)

https://substack.com/home/post/p-180813569

State of Terror – Louise Penny and Hilary Rodham Clinton

Having read this book, I’m left with two insights:

One, I don’t know enough, and never will, to form any valid opinions about anything political.  It’s beyond complicated.  Whatever ‘it’ is.

Two, what the fuck.  I mean, if an insider such as Clinton, who DOES know enough to form valid opinions, thinks this could happen …

(Okay, three–what she implies about Trump is as scarey, more scarey, than I imagined.)

Exposing the IPCC

Just finished reading Donna Laframboise’s expose of the IPCC, The Delinquent Teenager who was mistaken for the world’s top climate expert.   Laframboise is a Canadian journalist, not an American climate denier, and yes, the book did lower my esteem for the IPCC.

But that doesn’t mean that its conclusions (such as CO2 warms the atmosphere, with devastating consequences …) are incorrect.  Klein, Suzuki, McKibben, Hansen …

The Cockroach – Ian McEwan

Wickedly funny.  British, but frighteningly international and, of course, the President of the U.S. had to be included …

Climate Scientists Reacats to Trump’s UN Speech

Academic Pursuits, Guy R. McPherson – a delightful/intelligent read/expose

“‘Fahrenheit 451 of the Vanities’ in which an eighties yuppie is denied books; he does not object, or even notice.” p5

“‘Night of the Living Dead Poets Society’: A mid-career professor in the humanities continuously re-lives the same poor performance in the classroom, as much to his own chagrin as that of his students.” p5

The book has several of these throughout.

“He is a dedicated and thoughtful teacher, which nearly cost him a promotions to full professor last year.”  p13

” … but ego and idiocy don’t count against the faculty we hire in the medical school.  They may be required attributes.”  p119

“Hurricanes?  Each one is declared a natural disaster, which forces the government—that’s you and me, folks—to pay for the beach houses that get washed away.  I guess they can’t figure out why the insurance companies refuse to sell insurance on those homes, so they just keep encouraging people to put ’em back up.”  p133-4

“Administrators appreciate quantitative measures.  That’s a nice way of saying ‘our dean can count, but he can’t read.'”  p151

The bit about the timesheet is hilarious, p175-6.  It reminds me of one of my past administrators telling me that no more than 40% of my students could fail.  But no, I’m not asking you to lie about their grades.  (Or the fact that they didn’t turn in half their assignments or even write the final exam.)

“If, since there is a divine plan for everything, students shouldn’t try to affect change.  They should just sit back and let life happen to them?”  p193

“If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.”  p224-5

“The Pope, who … still calls for unbridled population growth, thereby ensuring that millions will suffer while he prospers.”  p269

“I am strongly encouraged to be tolerant of the religious views of my students.  But if they knew my views [atheist], they wouldn’t be tolerant.  … only two ways to get fired from my tenured faculty position, one of which is to demonstrate the slightest intolerance for their views, which are themselves based on intolerance …” p269-70

“and so it goes, people reproducing without any clue what it takes to raise another human being in a civilized manner, driving exponential population growth while quality of life for most inhabitants of the planet spirals downward, ever-faster, toward hell on earth.”  p271

Yeah.

“And all those people want their children to have a better life than they had, so they give them more stuff, with the end result that per capita consumption in the United States is increasing even faster … ” p271

Yeah.

“Meanwhile, Republicans and neo-classical economists beseech us to breed faster and buy more.  Especially if we’re buying American, whatever that means in this age of globalization.  A sustainable civilization?  I fear it’s well beyond our grasp.”  p271

Yeah.

“We haven’t managed to build a sustainable society on a spaceship the size of the planet, so it’s difficult to imagine we could develop one that would endure for several generations on a self-contained spacecraft.” p273

Let alone on another planet.  That doesn’t have, already, oxygen and water and soil.