Although our cautionary ‘Don’t blame the victim’ is very important in the context of assault, I think we have overgeneralized.
And although I would certainly put more blame on men than on women for our sexist society, because it is men who are in a position of dominance, I do think women are often to blame.
We have agency.
We are not idiots.
And often we are not coerced.
And yet often we are complicit in our own subordination.
We speak in a higher register than is actually necessary and thus come across as child-like.
We smile more often than we need to and thus cancel the importance of our words.
We endorse the importance of our appearance by wearing make-up to cover blemishes and wrinkles and by constantly dieting.
Worse, we emphasize the sexuality of our appearance—by reddening our lips, emphasizing our breasts, exposing our legs—as a matter of daily routine.
No one coerces us to do any of that. Coercion is implicated when you allow yourself to be assaulted by your live-in partner because that’s the only way to feed your kids, when you do not refuse because someone has drugged your drink, and when you shut the fuck up because otherwise he’ll kill you. Coercion is not implicated when you wear high heels and a dress.
Cultural conditioning, social expectation, peer pressure—my god, you can’t resist that? Grow a spine!
I’m suspect of claims that one would be fired if one stopped performing femininity. (Try doing so in small increments.) (Try suing.)
I imagine that yes, one might not get hired for some jobs if one doesn’t perform femininity, but hey—apply for a job somewhere else.
But yes, since Hooters pays more than Walmart, I may be asking you to make a sacrifice—for the greater good.
Because only when men don’t see us as hooters will the female sales associate at Walmart be considered for a managerial position. It seems to be all or nothing. If men see us as sexual, they see us as only sexual. If we have sexual power, we won’t have any other kind of power—political, economic, social.
So please, don’t use your sexuality to get what you want.* It just makes it harder for the rest of us to be considered persons, with interests and abilities other than having sex and having kids.
Yes, I know you can use your sexuality to get what you want. Men are idiot children when it comes to breasts, buttocks, and legs.
But make no mistake. They are in power. Over us. They own most of the property, they hold most of the managerial positions, they hold most of the political positions, they make more money than we do… And they typically don’t concern themselves with ethics (speaking up about doing the right thing gets them accused of being a boyscout, of going soft….), and that adds to their power: they will not hesitate to hurt us. Just take a look at contemporary porn, which is thanks to the internet viewed by most men, often starting younger than you might think. (You are, you become, what you expose yourself to.)
So please, just don’t do it.
Don’t wear make-up and heels. Don’t even expose your legs. Unless you’re sure you’re not being sexual about it (don’t shave). Present yourself as a person, not specifically a female person.
And don’t expect a man to pay your way for anything. Only invalids and children need to have someone else pay their way.
Don’t even accept it because you think he’s just being nice. He’s not paying your way to be nice. He’s paying your way to express his superiority (just watch how angry he gets when you insist on paying his way) and to underscore your need for him, your dependence on him.
And unless you really like kids (did you want to become a nursery school teacher?), don’t have them. In our society, there is no stronger, no more complete, trap into subordination. Because then you will need him. Then you will become dependent on him. Which will triple his power over you. (Because look, you can’t take your infant to work with you, so you will need someone to look after it while you’re out earning rent, and that will cost, probably as much, or almost as much, as you make, so you still won’t have rent…) (Better to form an alliance with another mother; you can work eight hours at your job while she looks after yours and hers, then she can work eight hours at her job while you look after hers and yours.)
*I’ll respond in advance to all the sex-pozzie accusations that I’m a prude, that I’m anti-sex, that I don’t like sex. You know what? You’re right. I am anti-sex. I don’t like sex. Not as it typically occurs today. Which is primarily for men’s pleasure, often via women’s pain (physical and psychological– anal penetration, vaginal penetration without sufficient lubrication, often accompanied by humiliation, degradation, insult…). Sex for women’s pleasure wouldn’t even involve the penis! The clitoris (which is not in the vagina or the rectum) best responds to tongues and fingers.
[Hell Yeah, I’m a Feminist is a feminist blog, often radical feminist (radfem), always anti-gender and anti-sexism.]
2 comments
I asked my wife about that last and her answer was that when she envelopes my penis with her vagina, the act reinforces her sense of intimacy and connectedness towards me and our fifteen year relationship in a way that clitoral stimulation does not do as well for her.
This sense of intimacy and connectedness is something that she claims to value and find emotionally pleasing.
It seems that she differentiates between physical pleasure and emotional pleasure and because of this does not choose to maximize her physical pleasure by always engaging in clitoral stimulation, but chooses to vary her sexual practices so as to experience both physical and emotional pleasure.
Okay, before metaphorical digital winds direct me elsewhere, I would like to point out that the exact position of clitoral complex and the specifics of innervation topology are very variable among women, so it is entirely possible for a woman to experience enjoyment (often a different, distinct kind) from vaginal and/or anal stimulation.
We are not factory-assembled robots and do have differences in terms of how various stimuli are interpreted and processed, so it would be very nice if people refrained from generalizing a certain subset of sexual experiences to “all women everywhere”.
Just my uppity two cents.